↖ CPA Weather Lab

Historical Gridded Snow Products: A Field Guide

Coverage, access, value, and how each product fits into historical snowfall reconstruction for the northeastern US. Links checked September 2026.

Snow products fall into four families, and mixing them up is the most common mistake in historical snow work.

Observed snowfall grids interpolate station snowfall reports, so their numbers trace back to someone measuring snow. Reanalyses run a weather model constrained by observations; their snowfall is model physics, and their trustworthy parts, especially early on, are pressure, geopotential, temperature and thickness. Snowpack products carry snow depth or water equivalent, but not snowfall. Satellite products map snow cover or precipitation, but none reaches back before 1966.

For any question about how much snow fell before 1960, only three kinds of source have anything to say: station records, the observed grids built from them, and the 20th-century reanalyses.

Coverage by decade

Dataset<19001900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Observed snowfall grids
Kluver d526000
NSIDC G100211959
NCDC DSI-37211948
RSI storm grids*
SNODAS2003
NOHRSC NSA2008
Reanalyses
20CRv31836–2015
ERA-20C–2010
CERA-20C1901–2010
ERA5
ERA5-Land
JRA-3Q1947
NCEP R11948
GLDAS Noah 2.01948–2014
JRA-551958–2024
NARR1979
CFSR/CFSv21979
NLDAS-21979
MERRA-2
SWE / snow depth only
Livneh1915–2011
Daymet SWE
UA SWE1981
Satellite
NOAA NH snow cover1966
IMS1997
MODIS
GPM DPR2014

full decadestarts that yearends that year2020s = through 2026 · *RSI = major storms only

Show as imageCoverage chart of historical snow products by decade

Observed snowfall grids

Built from station snowfall reports. These are the only products whose snowfall values come from measurements rather than model physics.

Kluver et al. 2016 (GDEX d526000)

Coverage
1900–2009
Resolution
1° daily, North America
Type
Observed snowfall

Where to get it

What's valuable

The only continuous daily snowfall grid built from station data that covers the whole 20th century. Its companion station-report files let you trace which stations fed each cell on each day, and for historical work that traceability is worth as much as the grid.

How to use it vs. the others

Use this as the observed baseline and the benchmark any regional product must beat. Prefer the GDEX copy: it is NetCDF, split by year, and citable. At 1° it cannot resolve ridge–valley or lake-effect gradients, so treat its values as area averages, not point estimates. It is built from COOP, so any 1960s grid is off-limits as an input to a 1960s blind test.

Watch out: Coarse. Inherits COOP observer-practice inhomogeneities. Nothing after 2009.

NSIDC G10021 (Mote et al. 2018)

Coverage
1959–2009
Resolution
1° daily, North America (114×58 grid)
Type
Observed snow + temperature + precipitation

Where to get it

What's valuable

Snow, temperature and precipitation on one shared grid from the same COOP and MSC station base. That makes it the easiest observed product for checking snowfall, temperature and precipitation against each other, for example testing phase and ratio assumptions against observations.

How to use it vs. the others

Best for 1959–2009 diagnostics that need snowfall and temperature on the same grid. It starts in 1959, so in a September 1959 frozen experiment it is a holdout benchmark only.

Watch out: Same 1° limits and COOP dependence as Kluver. Nothing after 2009.

NCDC DSI-3721 (Gridded US daily precip & snowfall)

Coverage
1948–1999
Resolution
0.5° daily, CONUS
Type
Observed precipitation + snowfall

Where to get it

What's valuable

Twice Kluver's resolution, with observation-time metadata attached to each value, which is rare and directly useful for aligning observation windows.

How to use it vs. the others

Worth requesting from NCEI. If you get it, it is the sharpest observed benchmark for 1948–1999, and its time-of-observation data can be used to check how reanalysis snowfall is aggregated into daily windows.

Watch out: Not downloadable right now: no NCEI directory and no known mirror.

NCEI Regional Snowfall Index storm grids

Coverage
1900–present
Resolution
~5 km storm-total grids, eastern two-thirds of US
Type
Observed snowfall, events only

Where to get it

What's valuable

High-resolution storm-total analyses for major snowstorms back to 1900, and the station-level storm totals behind them.

How to use it vs. the others

Use for event validation, e.g. checking whether a reconstructed daily grid reproduces the footprint and gradient of named storms. Not a climatology: quiet winters and small events are missing.

Watch out: Covers major storms only. Station-based, so it overlaps the COOP truth set.

SNODAS

Coverage
2003–present
Resolution
1 km daily, CONUS
Type
Model + data assimilation (snowpack + solid precipitation)

Where to get it

What's valuable

1 km snow depth, SWE and daily solid precipitation, with assimilated ground, airborne and satellite observations.

How to use it vs. the others

Use it to learn fine-scale terrain and elevation structure in the modern era, which can then be applied back in time as climatological downscaling patterns. Not a historical product.

Watch out: Starts late 2003. Its snowfall field is modeled, then nudged toward observations.

NOHRSC National Snowfall Analysis

Coverage
2008–present
Resolution
~4 km, 6–72 h and seasonal totals, CONUS
Type
Observed snowfall analysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

The closest thing to a modern observed high-resolution snowfall grid: it merges station reports with model background fields.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern-era target for training or calibrating the fine-scale spatial structure of snowfall, and a validation reference for any model applied to recent years.

Watch out: 2008 onward only; background-field dependence varies by version.

Reanalyses

Model physics constrained by observations. Their snowfall is model output. Their most trustworthy fields are pressure, geopotential, temperature and thickness, especially early in the record.

20CRv3

Coverage
1836–2015
Resolution
~0.7°, 80-member ensemble
Type
Reanalysis (surface pressure only assimilated)

Where to get it

What's valuable

The only reanalysis reaching back to the 1800s, with an ensemble that provides a spread-based uncertainty.

How to use it vs. the others

The pre-1940 driver. Take circulation, thickness and 850 hPa temperature from ensemble members, not the ensemble mean, so the spread carries through into snowfall uncertainty. Treat its snowfall and precipitation as weakly constrained.

Watch out: Only surface pressure is assimilated; temperature and precipitation are model-generated and spread is large before about 1920.

ERA-20C

Coverage
1900–2010
Resolution
~125 km
Type
Reanalysis (surface pressure + marine winds)

Where to get it

What's valuable

An independent 20th-century reanalysis with its own snowfall field, useful as a structural cross-check on 20CRv3.

How to use it vs. the others

Use for comparison: where 20CRv3 and ERA-20C disagree on thermodynamic fields, flag those days as low confidence.

Watch out: Coarse. Single deterministic member.

CERA-20C

Coverage
1901–2010
Resolution
~125 km, 10-member ensemble
Type
Coupled ocean–atmosphere reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Coupled ocean–atmosphere version of ERA-20C, with an ensemble.

How to use it vs. the others

Secondary cross-check. Its main extra value is coastal and sea-surface temperature consistency for nor'easter-season thermodynamics.

Watch out: Coarse; access via ECMWF.

ERA5

Coverage
1940–present
Resolution
0.25° hourly
Type
Full reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Snowfall (large-scale and convective), precipitation type, freezing level, 850 hPa temperature, thickness, and snow depth, hourly from 1940.

How to use it vs. the others

The post-1940 driver and the main source of SLR and phase predictors. Aggregate to each station's observation window, not to UTC days.

Watch out: Its snow depth assimilates station reports, so it leaks into any COOP holdout. Weaker before about 1958 because upper-air observations were sparse. Snowfall is model output.

ERA5-Land

Coverage
1950–present
Resolution
~9 km hourly, land only
Type
Offline land-model rerun forced by ERA5

Where to get it

What's valuable

Snow depth (physical and water equivalent), snow cover fraction, melt and density at 9 km with elevation-corrected temperature.

How to use it vs. the others

Use for snowpack questions only. Its snowfall is ERA5's interpolated, adding no new information about how much snow fell.

Watch out: No snow data assimilation, so its snowpack can drift. Accumulations run from 00 UTC through the day, unlike ERA5's per-hour values.

JRA-3Q

Coverage
1947–present
Resolution
~40 km
Type
Full reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

An independent full reanalysis starting in 1947 — the only one besides ERA5 covering the late 1940s and 1950s.

How to use it vs. the others

Use as an independent check on ERA5 thermodynamics for 1947–1958, where ERA5 is weakest.

Watch out: Access is simplest through GDEX.

NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 1

Coverage
1948–present
Resolution
~2.5°
Type
Full reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Long, stable, very widely used. Most classic teleconnection and circulation climatologies were built on it.

How to use it vs. the others

Use for circulation indices and pattern typing, where matching the published literature matters more than resolution.

Watch out: Too coarse for snowfall itself.

GLDAS Noah 2.0

Coverage
1948–2014
Resolution
0.25° 3-hourly
Type
Land data assimilation (offline)

Where to get it

What's valuable

Long offline land-model record with snowfall and snowpack terms.

How to use it vs. the others

Minor role: a cross-check on snowpack evolution.

Watch out: Forcing-dependent. Ends 2014.

JRA-55

Coverage
1958–2024
Resolution
~55 km
Type
Full reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Mature reanalysis, now superseded by JRA-3Q.

How to use it vs. the others

Prefer JRA-3Q unless you are matching published JRA-55 results.

Watch out: Ended in early 2024.

NARR

Coverage
1979–present
Resolution
32 km, 3-hourly, North America
Type
Regional reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Assimilates precipitation, so its precipitation is more realistic than in global reanalyses. Includes snow fields.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern-era mesoscale snow environment and precipitation-type climatology for the eastern US.

Watch out: 1979 onward only; check the current update status.

CFSR / CFSv2

Coverage
1979–present
Resolution
~38 km (T382)
Type
Coupled reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Coupled system with snowfall and snow fields.

How to use it vs. the others

Secondary modern cross-check.

Watch out: Discontinuity at the CFSR→CFSv2 join in 2011.

NLDAS-2

Coverage
1979–present
Resolution
0.125° hourly, CONUS
Type
Land data assimilation forcing and outputs

Where to get it

What's valuable

Hourly gauge-based precipitation forcing, with a frozen fraction, at 1/8°.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern hourly precipitation for building event-scale training data.

Watch out: The rain/snow split is a model partition, not an observation.

MERRA-2

Coverage
1980–present
Resolution
0.5°×0.625°
Type
Full reanalysis

Where to get it

What's valuable

Snowfall (PRECSNO), and a precipitation-corrected land surface.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern-era intercomparison member.

Watch out: 1980 onward only.

SWE / snow depth only

Snowpack products. They carry no snowfall field but are useful for melt, persistence and depth context.

Livneh

Coverage
1915–2011
Resolution
1/16° daily, CONUS
Type
Gridded observations + VIC snow model

Where to get it

What's valuable

Long, fine-resolution modeled SWE driven by gridded station precipitation and temperature from 1915.

How to use it vs. the others

Pre-1950 snowpack context at high resolution. Its gridded precipitation and temperature forcing is also a candidate liquid-precipitation layer.

Watch out: SWE is modeled, not observed. There is a 2019 version extending to 2018.

Daymet

Coverage
1980–present
Resolution
1 km daily, North America
Type
Gridded observations + simple snow model

Where to get it

What's valuable

1 km temperature, precipitation and SWE with terrain-aware interpolation.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern fine-scale terrain patterns for downscaling templates.

Watch out: SWE comes from a simple model.

UA SWE (Broxton/Zeng)

Coverage
1981–present
Resolution
4 km daily, CONUS
Type
Observation-assimilated SWE and depth

Where to get it

What's valuable

4 km SWE and snow depth constrained by SNOTEL and COOP observations — one of the best modern snowpack grids.

How to use it vs. the others

Modern snowpack validation.

Watch out: Uses COOP observations, so the same overlap concerns apply.

Satellite

Snow cover or precipitation from orbit. None reaches the pre-1960 era.

NOAA NH Snow Cover Extent (Rutgers CDR)

Coverage
1966–present
Resolution
~190 km weekly (daily later)
Type
Satellite snow cover

Where to get it

What's valuable

The longest satellite snow-cover record.

How to use it vs. the others

Large-scale snow-cover context from 1966 onward.

Watch out: Coarse, and records cover only, not snowfall.

IMS

Coverage
1997–present
Resolution
24 km → 4 km → 1 km daily
Type
Analyst-produced snow cover

Where to get it

What's valuable

Daily snow/no-snow maps drawn by analysts from satellite imagery.

How to use it vs. the others

Checking modern snow-cover persistence.

Watch out: Resolution changes in 2004 and 2014.

MODIS snow cover

Coverage
2000–present
Resolution
500 m daily
Type
Satellite snow cover

Where to get it

What's valuable

Fine-resolution snow-cover fraction.

How to use it vs. the others

Fine-scale modern snow-cover patterns.

Watch out: Gaps under cloud; cover only.

GPM DPR

Coverage
2014–present
Resolution
~5 km swaths
Type
Spaceborne precipitation radar

Where to get it

What's valuable

Radar precipitation retrievals from orbit, including snowfall.

How to use it vs. the others

Research into mid-latitude snowfall microphysics; little use for a historical grid.

Watch out: Swath sampling; short record.

Station foundation (not gridded)

GHCN-Daily is the station archive underneath nearly every observed grid in this guide: daily snowfall, snow depth, precipitation and temperature, many records going back to the 1890s or earlier.

By question: which product to reach for

Head-to-head comparisons

Pitfalls that sink historical snow work

← CPA Weather Lab · Learn